his_spiffynesss: (Default)
I caught Jaws on TV last night, it's been forever since I actually watched the movie. And one scene kind of stuck out at me. Roy Schrieder and Richard Dreyfuss' characters are talking to the Mayor after they had gone out and found the wrecked fisherman's boat. What I was noticing how frantic everyone was, and how they kept talking over each others lines, in much the way real people talk. 

Watching it made me realized that particular kind of performance is really uncommon nowadays. Admittedly it was more often associated with Robert Altman and his films. One good example being in M*A*S*H when the doctors first arrive and meet the rest of the staff in the mess tent. Hawkeye and Duke find themselves in the middle of conversations between Col. Blake, Radar and Father Mulcahy.

Just lately I can't think of any movie I have seen that tries to go with that kind of naturalistic dialogue. It's much more staid and focused with the usual back and forth pattern. I wonder if this is something the studios just don't like, since they assume the average film goer is an idiot who couldn't follow more that one track of dialogue at once, or if it's just something that has fallen out of favor with creators.
his_spiffynesss: (Default)
My cousin works at the local movie theater, so he was able to get us in for free to see the re-release of The Phantom Menace in 3D. It was mostly for the benefit of is eight year old nephew, who is the rabid Star Wars fan in the family.

But hey, it's a free movie, so I went to the theater with them, before hand I got on Rifftrax and downloaded their commentary for it and loaded it in my ipod. But it was clear a few minutes in I got my timing off, and ended up a couple minutes behind the movie. I gave it up by the time they got to Corruscont, and just sat through the rest of the movie with just regular audio.

It should come as no surprise that Lucas has gone and changed the movie. The puppet Yoda has been completely replaced with CGI, and I suspect a few extra scenes of the pod race drivers were added as well. The digital High Def transfer also made a lot of the minor details stand out, I found my eyes drawn to all the things Lucas probably didn't want me to notice, like all the fine hairs hanging out of Queen Amidala's ludicrous wigs or obvious rings of rubber around Darth Maul's horns. High Def is really something of a curse for Hollywood, it's making it harder to hide reality in movies.

As for the 3D transfer, it had the typical limitations of post production 3D transfers. You don't really get the field of depth you get with a full 3D production. At best you get two layers of depth, with some item in the foreground seeming a bit closer than the rest. By comparison, there was a preview for the new stop motion movie Paranorman, in 3D it was much more immersive than Phantom Menace. The scenes in the woods did feel like you were standing in the forest.

I'm thinking I'll skip the rest of the prequel 3D releases, but I will catch Star Wars and Empire. I'm thinking the flatter, old fashioned model effects of the originals will actually transfer better to 3D than all the fancy CGI model work of the prequels.
his_spiffynesss: (Default)
Over at io9, they had a post leading to a series of youtube videos by some film critic who has some interesting observations of Stanley Kubrick's The Shining.

Part One
Part Two

At least, it's interesting up to the second part. Part Threestarts delving into conspiracy theory territory about the Federal Reserve Bank and Part four is nothing but a thirteen minute Libertarian rant for a return to the gold standard. While Kubrick might have been something of a goldbug, this guy's obsessive focus on this seems extreme. He clearly had an agenda to push and used the movie as justification of his opinions.

The post on io9 prompted some discussion on Kubrick and his work, and somebody posted a link to the even more daft conspiracy about how The Shining is Stanley Kubrick's confession that he directed the fake moon landing footage.

It is one of the long standing habits of humanity to find "hidden meaning" in works such as these. It's a sign of Kubrick's genius that he crafted a movie that can be read on so many different levels, depending on your frame of mind. That's quite true of all great works of fiction, after all, the idea of the Wizard of Oz as a commentary on 1890's fiscal policy is a common meme even today, even if it was largely a late 20th century interpretation.

Profile

his_spiffynesss: (Default)
his_spiffynesss

July 2016

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 05:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios